Compare commits
No commits in common. "178086f72b78c594a64bafe2f8d005a93e65f9ca" and "595df422f37a5b544d58a195be5a6110c660405d" have entirely different histories.
178086f72b
...
595df422f3
|
@ -1,2 +1 @@
|
||||||
*.obsidian*
|
*.obsidian*
|
||||||
*/etc/*
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -1,5 +0,0 @@
|
||||||
- informs [[{Q} Why use Discourse Graphs for distributed research?]]
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Quite literally, DGs help keep members on the same page. For example:
|
|
||||||
- DGs make it easier to see the big picture or zoom into details
|
|
||||||
- DGs make it easier to explore the research frontier, by looking at unanswered questions or unsubstantiated claims.
|
|
|
@ -1,4 +0,0 @@
|
||||||
- informs [[{Q} How common is the use of discourse graphs for research?]]
|
|
||||||
- generates [[{Q} What tools are employed today by distributed research teams?]]
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Ronen- the science community generates a lot of research but much less of this kind of "meta research" - research about how we do research, what tools we use etc.
|
|
|
@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
|
||||||
- informs [[{Q} How common is the use of discourse graphs for research?]]
|
|
||||||
- opposes [[{CLM} Discourse Graphs help maintain group coherence]]
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Not sure if opposes [[{CLM} Discourse Graphs help maintain group coherence]] is the right relation, but there is definitely tension between these two claims: if DGs are so useful, why do so few teams use them?
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- generates [[{Q} Why do few teams use DGs?]]
|
|
|
@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ This document is subject to adaptation as we experiment with new node and edge t
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Node types
|
# Node types
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- Q - Question
|
- QUE - Question
|
||||||
- CLM - Claim
|
- CLM - Claim
|
||||||
- EVD - Evidence
|
- EVD - Evidence
|
||||||
- SRC - Source
|
- SRC - Source
|
||||||
|
@ -12,12 +12,10 @@ This document is subject to adaptation as we experiment with new node and edge t
|
||||||
All node names should be prefixed with {`type`}, e.g., `{SRC} Example Source`
|
All node names should be prefixed with {`type`}, e.g., `{SRC} Example Source`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Edge types
|
# Edge types
|
||||||
(based on https://oasislab.pubpub.org/pub/54t0y9mk#7c8st7en56)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- EVD or CLM Informs Q (for EVD created in response to an existing Q)
|
- EVD or CLM Informs QUE
|
||||||
- EVD or CLM Generates Q (for EVD or CLM resulting in a new Q)
|
- EVD Supports CLM
|
||||||
- EVD Support/Opposes CLM
|
- EVD Opposes CLM
|
||||||
- CLM Supports/Opposes CLM
|
|
||||||
- SRC Contains EVD (optional - may be omitted since only one type of SRC-EVD edge possible)
|
- SRC Contains EVD (optional - may be omitted since only one type of SRC-EVD edge possible)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
All edges should conform to one of the following types, along with the source and target node types.
|
All edges should conform to one of the following types, along with the source and target node types.
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue