Add first contribution to the main graph!

dgraph/Main/{CLM} Discourse Graphs help maintain group coherence.md

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+- informs [[{Q} Why use Discourse Graphs for distributed research?]]
+
+Quite literally, DGs help keep members on the same page. For example:
+- DGs make it easier to see the big picture or zoom into details 
+- DGs make it easier to explore the research frontier, by looking at unanswered questions or unsubstantiated claims.

dgraph/Main/{CLM} There is little attention in the scientific literature to the topic of tools supporting distributed research.md

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+- informs [[{Q} How common is the use of discourse graphs for research?]]
+- generates [[{Q} What tools are employed today by distributed research teams?]] 
+
+Ronen- the science community generates a lot of research but much less of this kind of "meta research" - research about how we do research, what tools we use etc.

dgraph/Main/{CLM} Very few teams use Discourse Graphs or graph-based similar methods.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- informs [[{Q} How common is the use of discourse graphs for research?]]
+- opposes [[{CLM} Discourse Graphs help maintain group coherence]]
+
+Not sure if opposes [[{CLM} Discourse Graphs help maintain group coherence]] is the right relation, but there is definitely tension between these two claims: if DGs are so useful, why do so few teams use them?
+
+- generates [[{Q} Why do few teams use DGs?]]