38 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
38 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
|
The communication protocol(s) among network nodes
|
||
|
Each communication protocol among network nodes
|
||
|
has its own purpose
|
||
|
has its own assumptions, expectations, requirements, constraints
|
||
|
|
||
|
I think it makes sense to identify the constraints for our protocols.
|
||
|
|
||
|
We need the general public to be able to reliably
|
||
|
|
||
|
- Query information about the reputation WDAG
|
||
|
- Submit requests and fees for work
|
||
|
- Obtain the products of the work submitted by forum experts
|
||
|
|
||
|
Suppose we want only the requestor to be able to access a given work product.
|
||
|
(Why might we want this?)
|
||
|
Then the (soft) protocol for reviewing the work product would consist of
|
||
|
validating a signature by the requestor, attesting to their acceptance of the work product.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Alternatively access could be permitted to some group, such as reputation holders (a.k.a. experts).
|
||
|
|
||
|
Otherwise, for maximum utility, we would want to make the work products available indefinitely, as valuable artifacts.
|
||
|
Value here can be equated to the expected fees that the work products will help attract, which can in turn be equated to
|
||
|
reputation awarded to authors and reviewers of the work products.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Thus, the work of making the artifacts available must be funded.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The work of participating in a gossip / forum node consensus protocol and validating forum chain blocks must also be funded.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Suppose we have a storage contract.
|
||
|
|
||
|
- There can be a market for specific pledges of storage.
|
||
|
- buy: (amount, duration, price)
|
||
|
- sell: (amount, duration, price)
|
||
|
- Governance: Management of storage price
|
||
|
- may negotiate via loose -> tight binding traversal forum post sequence
|
||
|
- reputation in accordance with majority opinions on price parameters
|
||
|
- Verification of storage must occur by (randomly) querying the storage nodes and validating their responses.
|