CoGMDR Ontology #7

New Issue

2023-07-09T09:14:39-05:00

ronentk commented

2023-07-09 09:14:39 -05:00

(Migrated from gitlab.com)

Basic Ontology Proposal

(part of #6)

Node types
- Discourse Graph basic types
  - QUE - Question
  - CLM - Claim
  - EVD - Evidence
  - SRC - Source - not sure what this means but I think
- Additions for Science DAO (SD)
  - PRP - Proposal
  - P - Post (default post, for everything else)
Edge types
- Discourse Graph basic types
  - EVD Informs QUE
  - EVD Supports CLM
  - EVD Opposes CLM
- Additions for SD
  - Member upvotes Node
  - Member downvotes Node
  - Post cites Node
  - Post replies to Node
Metadata tracking
- Authorship of edges and nodes

Sources

Questions

What are the semantics of votes? Votes can mean
- “I support/object to this” → to the content of a proposal
- “I found this interesting” → I support bringing this to the attention of other members
Perhaps we would like to have a different relation to represent each of these cases?
I’m not sure what the semantics of SRC are, they aren’t really mentioned in the documentation. Perhaps SRC refers to the reference itself, meaning each EVD node should be a snippet from a SRC. In that case we could add a relation:
- SRC contains EVD
Also not sure about the relation of claims and questions. Based on the diagram here, there should be a relation CLM informs/generates QUE, maybe worth adding?
The node and edge set should be open ended and evolved as needed. Additions of nodes/edges could be formalized as Proposals if we want to be fancy.
Ideally this could be “Note Zero” for our project, we could already decompose it into a collection of nodes of different types. But maybe better to wait until we have a basic graph UI?

# Basic Ontology Proposal (part of #6) - Node types - Discourse Graph basic types - QUE - Question - CLM - Claim - EVD - Evidence - SRC - Source - not sure what this means but I think - Additions for Science DAO (SD) - PRP - Proposal - P - Post (default post, for everything else) - Edge types - Discourse Graph basic types - EVD Informs QUE - EVD Supports CLM - EVD Opposes CLM - Additions for SD - Member upvotes Node - Member downvotes Node - Post cites Node - Post replies to Node - Metadata tracking - Authorship of edges and nodes # Sources - https://oasis-lab.gitbook.io/roamresearch-discourse-graph-extension/fundamentals/the-base-grammar-questions-claims-and-evidence - https://oasislab.pubpub.org/pub/54t0y9mk/release/3 # Questions - What are the semantics of votes? Votes can mean - “I support/object to this” → to the content of a proposal - “I found this interesting” → I support bringing this to the attention of other members Perhaps we would like to have a different relation to represent each of these cases? - I’m not sure what the semantics of SRC are, they aren’t really mentioned in the documentation. Perhaps SRC refers to the reference itself, meaning each EVD node should be a snippet from a SRC. In that case we could add a relation: - SRC contains EVD - Also not sure about the relation of claims and questions. Based on the diagram [here](https://oasislab.pubpub.org/pub/54t0y9mk#7c8st7en56), there should be a relation CLM informs/generates QUE, maybe worth adding? - The node and edge set should be open ended and evolved as needed. Additions of nodes/edges could be formalized as Proposals if we want to be fancy. - Ideally this could be “Note Zero” for our project, we could already decompose it into a collection of nodes of different types. But maybe better to wait until we have a basic graph UI?

ronentk commented

2023-07-09 09:14:51 -05:00

(Migrated from gitlab.com)

marked this issue as related to #6